If this was in fact taken in Afghanistan, it would have had to be in the 80’s. The MI-24 (Hind) is a Russian Helicopter. Why would their paint job bring up the American budget? Also If you look at the first picture, those are obviously Russian uniforms. Why don't you read up and get back to us.RedOctober said:Guess why the American war budget is sooooo high
Nag nag...
BTW... Birds don't have rotor blades.![]()
breakology said:aaahhh yes ... we had hoped that the Iraqis would run in fear, but apparently they are not as impressed by our "flying machines & horseless carriages" as we had hoped. lol ....
MaxPower said:If this was in fact taken in Afghanistan, it would have had to be in the 80’s. The MI-24 (Hind) is a Russian Helicopter. Why would their paint job bring up the American budget? Also If you look at the first picture, those are obviously Russian uniforms. Why don't you read up and get back to us.
Oh, but you are obviously up on your Biology. You are correct in stating that Birds don't have rotor blades.![]()
You're full of crap. You thought the hind was one of ours and you know it. Why don't you just admit when you made an ass out of yourself?RedOctober said:Where are you talking about?
Afghanistan or Iraq?
Not me!
I was talking about the American war budget.
I don't care where that picture is taken.
RedOctober said:Guess why the American war budget is sooooo high
Nag nag...
BTW... Birds don't have rotor blades.![]()
magnolia said:"The story is: this very special Mi-24 helicopter is presently flying in Afghanistan, where it is no doubt causing quite a stir."
Common as it may be to assume that any neat-o piece of military hardware must be American — especially when it's painted to look like the same type of bird that serves as the U.S. national symbol — the helicopter shown here is not American, nor has it been used by U.S. forces in Afghanistan or Iraq.