So, I was thumbing through my lastest issue of MAD magazine, and I came across a parody of the Lemony Snicket movie (Which I never saw). Something didn't seem right in those screencaps, but it took me about ten seconds to figure out what it was...
Lo and behold, movie makeup to the nth degree! I thought movie stars were always looking young because of makeup (Which is true!), but in this case, it made them look artificial, kind of like a CG rendering. Why did it appear like this?
Movie makeup on preteen stars, including babies. Hey, retards, thanks for catering to the pedophiles for us! How young do you have to make people look? They're under 20, they don't even have anything RESEMBLING stress marks or wrinkles yet! Is America really that obsessed with looks that even child stars have to be rid of "anomolies" which don't even exist?
Take a look on the telly. Tune in to Extra, ET, whatever. Look around. Notice the pattern? SUPERSTARS ARE ONLY BEING JUDGED BY LOOKS. Even kids can't evade this; it has become an unwritten rule in the industry:
You "ugly?" You fail!
I am probobly one out of three males in my school who would date a chick REGARDLESS of her looks, even if she was fat as hell, and we still shared things in common, call it a date!
People need to start paying more attention to the inner beauty of humans, as opposed to the exterior beauty. I'm pretty sure those child stars are assholes, and that goes for EVERYONE ELSE who is on any of those "spam" Hollywood news shows. I think it's time we went back to the 1920's, in the days of silent movies, when we had ugly people (Like Charlie Chaplin), who achieved headlines because of SKILL and PERSONALITY, NOT LOOKS. My father has an actual autographed picture from him...how many people do you know today would do that for you?
This is one of the reasons I fear about video games becoming integrated with mainstream culture someday. Sooner or later, you'll be hearing about "John Romero's new hairstyle," or "Gabe Newell's amazing new weight loss diet," more than "Romero, now 63, makes millions off of a new port of Daikatana released for the millions of Linux users; game publications say 'Sorry for fucking you over back in 2000, we were biased!'" or "Gabe Newell re-releases Half-Life 2 for Linux; makes millions in a matter of days."
Better yet would be "Carmack and Romero participate in Quaigen Research's 'Super-Entertainer' project. The DNA from both these people have been spliced, to create a super-sexy (I ain't gay, just quoting stuff from his picture page that his female fans post), super autistic, super talented artist/game designer/OpenGL 15.0 programmer."
Of course, by then would would be reading about "Babay Romerack: Ain't he cute?"
I think that those "spam" news shows should at least report something more skin deep than looks alone; how about we start seeing headlines like "Ben Stiller is an Asshole," or "Fuck Anna Nicole Smith: Ugly, mean, nasty whore! Poll: Should Anna Nicole Smith Get the Chair for being a menace to society?"
Hollywood, wake up, because if everything keeps being based on looks as opposed to talent, your days are numbered.
Lo and behold, movie makeup to the nth degree! I thought movie stars were always looking young because of makeup (Which is true!), but in this case, it made them look artificial, kind of like a CG rendering. Why did it appear like this?
Movie makeup on preteen stars, including babies. Hey, retards, thanks for catering to the pedophiles for us! How young do you have to make people look? They're under 20, they don't even have anything RESEMBLING stress marks or wrinkles yet! Is America really that obsessed with looks that even child stars have to be rid of "anomolies" which don't even exist?
Take a look on the telly. Tune in to Extra, ET, whatever. Look around. Notice the pattern? SUPERSTARS ARE ONLY BEING JUDGED BY LOOKS. Even kids can't evade this; it has become an unwritten rule in the industry:
You "ugly?" You fail!
I am probobly one out of three males in my school who would date a chick REGARDLESS of her looks, even if she was fat as hell, and we still shared things in common, call it a date!
People need to start paying more attention to the inner beauty of humans, as opposed to the exterior beauty. I'm pretty sure those child stars are assholes, and that goes for EVERYONE ELSE who is on any of those "spam" Hollywood news shows. I think it's time we went back to the 1920's, in the days of silent movies, when we had ugly people (Like Charlie Chaplin), who achieved headlines because of SKILL and PERSONALITY, NOT LOOKS. My father has an actual autographed picture from him...how many people do you know today would do that for you?
This is one of the reasons I fear about video games becoming integrated with mainstream culture someday. Sooner or later, you'll be hearing about "John Romero's new hairstyle," or "Gabe Newell's amazing new weight loss diet," more than "Romero, now 63, makes millions off of a new port of Daikatana released for the millions of Linux users; game publications say 'Sorry for fucking you over back in 2000, we were biased!'" or "Gabe Newell re-releases Half-Life 2 for Linux; makes millions in a matter of days."
Better yet would be "Carmack and Romero participate in Quaigen Research's 'Super-Entertainer' project. The DNA from both these people have been spliced, to create a super-sexy (I ain't gay, just quoting stuff from his picture page that his female fans post), super autistic, super talented artist/game designer/OpenGL 15.0 programmer."
Of course, by then would would be reading about "Babay Romerack: Ain't he cute?"
I think that those "spam" news shows should at least report something more skin deep than looks alone; how about we start seeing headlines like "Ben Stiller is an Asshole," or "Fuck Anna Nicole Smith: Ugly, mean, nasty whore! Poll: Should Anna Nicole Smith Get the Chair for being a menace to society?"
Hollywood, wake up, because if everything keeps being based on looks as opposed to talent, your days are numbered.
