WTF ... IS WTF!?
We are a collective of people who believe in freedom of speech, the rights of individuals, and free pancakes! We share our lives, struggles, frustrations, successes, joys, and prescribe to our own special brand of humor and insanity. If you are looking for a great place to hang out, make new friends, find new nemeses, and just be yourself, WTF.com is your new home.
Movies books...to...movies
- Thread starter Halfpintrocker
- Start date
in my experience the book is always better than the remake hollywood trash
for instance, queen of the damned.... great book...... movie was loosely based upon it.... and was about 15% accurate
another example... jurassic park the lost world........ again, loosely based on the book
to be honest i cant think of a single book to movie that i've read that didnt suck horribly
edit: except lotr.... i read some of those, books sucked, movies rocked
for instance, queen of the damned.... great book...... movie was loosely based upon it.... and was about 15% accurate
another example... jurassic park the lost world........ again, loosely based on the book
to be honest i cant think of a single book to movie that i've read that didnt suck horribly
edit: except lotr.... i read some of those, books sucked, movies rocked
I got o say Carrie was pretty good... yet pet Semetary was nothing at all like the book... I mean... Juds wife wasnt even in the movie... yet she was in almost all the book... till she dies i mean... but she was in the book adn not the movie... I didnt read the book Carrie tho so i cant compare ... it was a good movie tho... i am about to read Cujo... anyone read it or seen the movie??oh and IT was good... yet again I have not read the book...
I've never heard of a situation where someone actually liked the movie more than the book. They are different mediums and certain things have to be lost in the transition. This on it's own is fine by me though. What annoys me is when film makers take a story and completely bastardize it to the point that it has almost no resemblance to the original work, and then still stick the original title on there purely for name-recognition. For example, this new I,Robot shit that's coming out isn't even based on I,Robot. The story is taken from another Asimov book Cages of Steel, and only loosely at that (basically my friend who has read the book says that it only appears to have the characters' names). It's basically shitting all over one good book, and then wiping their asses with the title of the other.
-
Want to get something off your chest? You've found the right place! To learn more about our site, please visit our About Us section.
It takes less than 30 seconds to gain access to posting, and many other hidden features available. Why not register your free account today? You also have the option via Google, Facebook, or Twitter!