Saving money anyway you can! This is the new phony-guilded era if you ask me. I guess materialistic items such as a Louis Vitton purse makes stupid people happy. At least she is not worried about what she looks like in a grocery store. Or in a welfare line for that matter. What's up with that.mariakyann said:Today, a woman paid for her groceries with Food Stamps, and I thought well, thats sad, i hope her kids are thriving. Then I saw the Louis Vitton purse. Needless to say, I am enraged.
you could have stopped there. it's a scarce resource around here.maxpower said:But then my nature causes me to think
if she can still make ends meet, that's one thing. but if 'once in a while' seems more and more frequent, and the kids suddenly aren't eating.. eh..maxpower said:I'm not trying to be combatant. I just think that if a woman gets a boost to her self esteem once in a while, the mental benefit is justifiable.
Who would know better than you............ Wait.......having......a ........sixth grade flashback.........Can't control........it. It takes one to know one.morelos said:you could have stopped there. it's a scarce resource around here.
morelos said:if she can still make ends meet, that's one thing. but if 'once in a while' seems more and more frequent, and the kids suddenly aren't eating.. eh..
~ dan ~
tharuz said:New fetish: mindfucking
It was probably some cheap rip-off purse.mariakyann said:Today, a woman paid for her groceries with Food Stamps, and I thought well, thats sad, i hope her kids are thriving. Then I saw the Louis Vitton purse. Needless to say, I am enraged.
time to get yelled at by bullshyt, but oh well:voiceofreason said:You want to get outraged, look at the cost of this nonsense war...
If you took offense to it, you OBVIOUSLY took it the wrong way. Your homework for today is to go back and read it again, then decide what I really meant, before just mindlessly looking for controversy.Pachyderm said:Okay, I definatly take offence to "the woman's psyche comment." I realize that it seems more obvious that men are visually stimulated and women are more emotionally stimulated, but I beg to differ. Woman are just as visually stimulated and emotionally stimulated. Maybe the difference would be intellectual stimulation. I don't need to have a hand bag to make myself feel good, and I guess people tend to forget that just because women are women, they aren't all the same...just like I don't asume that men need a certain 'umph' to make them feel 'manly. I think it's just an individual pleasure whether or not a man or woman need something to make them feel better.
You can rant, you just cant flame other forum members.mariakyann said:and if this is a place that we are allowed to rant on, then i should not have to think before i rant. i just want to rant. i don't really care if people agree with my rant.