WTF ... IS WTF!?
We are a collective of people who believe in freedom of speech, the rights of individuals, and free pancakes! We share our lives, struggles, frustrations, successes, joys, and prescribe to our own special brand of humor and insanity. If you are looking for a great place to hang out, make new friends, find new nemeses, and just be yourself, WTF.com is your new home.

Discuss Geoengineering and you.

JLXC

WTF's Official Conspiracy Fanatic
Premium
7,550
262
302
#22
I refuse your article on the grounds that it quotes a study that uses the CDC for a source, and everyone knows pedo satanists can't science. Fruit of the tainted tree and all that.

Austism is a disease, thus, one must be ALIVE to have it.

I was asking about infant mortality, which has been ever decreasing since at least the turn of the 20th century.

Even your illegitimate-cdc-pedo-sourcing study isn't denying it.

They are saying that the rates at which infant mortality is declining is not equal throughout 'comparable' developed nations.

The numbers the study uses are averaged IMR's (which they source from both the CDC AND the CIA and then maths them), are 3.36 on the low end and 5.19 on the high end.

What do those two numbers represent?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infant_mortality

Those are rates per thousand births.

So 3.36 v. 5.19 becomes 0.336% v. 0.519%.

Baby deaths aren't good no matter how you measure them. But there simply aren't as many as there used to be. Looking for the differences in societies, environments, and even reporting is a wonderful way to try and help solve the problem.

The summary of your quoted study even says more study is called for on the subject and that they may have found a possible source.

Since my reliable source isn't on your list of approved sources, and your reliable source isn't on mine, I suppose we're just going to have to disagree on life, each while living our own.
I don't have a list of approved sources, but I do check who's paying for the information unlike most everyone.

In Memoriam: Infant Deaths & Vaccination

https://www.nvic.org/NVIC-Vaccine-News/May-2011/In-Memoriam--Infant-Deaths---Vaccination.aspx

------------------------------------
^
This is from 2011 and it's only increased a great deal since then.
------------------------------------

2-month old Dies 48 hours After 8 Vaccines: Owen’s Mom Speaks Out

http://www.stopmandatoryvaccination...-hours-after-8-vaccines-owens-mom-speaks-out/
--------------------------------------

U.S. now leads the industrialized world in infant mortality due to toxic vaccinations

https://www.naturalnews.com/2017-12...fant-mortality-due-to-toxic-vaccinations.html

--------------------------------------------

Here's a nurse (there are many) speaking out about this insanity.


----------------------------------------------

So believe what you will, I don't do this for the hopeless. I do this so people who can still think and process information without dogmatic brainwashing can decide for themselves what is true.

Don't believe me, or anyone else on this board, look for yourself people.

The battle is in full swing, it's for your mind, use it well.
 

BrIONwoshMunky

EVERYBODY LOVE EVERYBODY!
Staff
9,589
1,282
387
#23
This is from 2011 and it's only increased a great deal since then.
That's article is again quoting the same study you linked before which is fine as there are multiple sources listed. Just letting you know that sources you've deemed unreliable are being used in your argument.

And what is the 'it' to which you are now referring?
 

JLXC

WTF's Official Conspiracy Fanatic
Premium
7,550
262
302
#24
That's article is again quoting the same study you linked before which is fine as there are multiple sources listed. Just letting you know that sources you've deemed unreliable are being used in your argument.

And what is the 'it' to which you are now referring?
Well the study you don't like I linked to was published in 2018
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PNAS January 18, 2018. 201716561; published ahead of print January 18, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1716561115


  1. Edited by Peter Palese, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, and approved December 15, 2017 (received for review September 19, 2017)

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

so how did they get it in 2011?

The "It" is the radical and ever increasing number of vaccines they try to pump into everyone, from babies to pregnant women, to making it mandatory where possible.

Since they're meant to poison and damage people, they have increased the poisoning nearly exponentially since 2011.
That "It".
 

BrIONwoshMunky

EVERYBODY LOVE EVERYBODY!
Staff
9,589
1,282
387
#25
Well the study you don't like I linked to was published in 2018
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PNAS January 18, 2018. 201716561; published ahead of print January 18, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1716561115


  1. Edited by Peter Palese, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, and approved December 15, 2017 (received for review September 19, 2017)

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

so how did they get it in 2011?
I am sorry, but that isn't the study to which I am referring.

http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0960327111407644

The study to which I am referring, which addresses infant mortality, was quoted in one of your links happens to also be the study that uses data from the CDC to make your point. But, you've also said that the CDC is full of pedo satanists so anything they say is wrong or tainted.

The "It" is the radical and ever increasing number of vaccines they try to pump into everyone, from babies to pregnant women, to making it mandatory where possible.

Since they're meant to poison and damage people, they have increased the poisoning nearly exponentially since 2011.
That "It".
Let's stick with just the infants for now and do this one piece at a time.

How many more vaccines are we suggesting and/or mandating for babies in 2018 v. 2011?

Because an exponential increase is quite large.
 

BrIONwoshMunky

EVERYBODY LOVE EVERYBODY!
Staff
9,589
1,282
387
#26
I am sorry, but that isn't the study to which I am referring.

http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0960327111407644

The study to which I am referring, which addresses infant mortality, was quoted in one of your links happens to also be the study that uses data from the CDC to make your point. But, you've also said that the CDC is full of pedo satanists so anything they say is wrong or tainted.



Let's stick with just the infants for now and do this one piece at a time.

How many more vaccines are we suggesting and/or mandating for babies in 2018 v. 2011?

Because an exponential increase is quite large.
For a start, here's the chart from the 2011 study, which uses 2008-2009 schedules from the CDC and other sources.

http://journals.sagepub.com/na101/h...es/large/10.1177_0960327111407644-table2.jpeg



So, The US is the largest with 26 doses of vaccines before the age of 12 months.

Now all we need is the 'nearly exponentially' increased 2012+ numbers to verify your statement.

Lets pull them from this chart: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules/hcp/imz/child-adolescent.html shall we?

Hep-b - 3 doses
Rotavirus - 3 doses
DTaP - 3 doses at 3 vaccines = 9 doses
Hib - 3 doses before 12 months
PCV13 - 3 doses
IPV - 3 doses
IIV - 2 doses
MenACWY-CRM ≥2 mos - 3 doses*** even though this is a special case scenerio.

3+3+9+3+3+3+2+3= 29 doses

Wait a fucking minute. 26 doses in 2008-2009 and 29 doses in 2018? And that's including special scenario only meningococcal vaccines. I'm also going to venture to guess that back in 2008 that the meningococcal vaccine was a special scenario only vaccine too, and not included in the study calculations.

See, I can Google and read shit too.
 
Last edited: