WTF ... IS WTF!?
We are a collective of people who believe in freedom of speech, the rights of individuals, and free pancakes! We share our lives, struggles, frustrations, successes, joys, and prescribe to our own special brand of humor and insanity. If you are looking for a great place to hang out, make new friends, find new nemeses, and just be yourself, WTF.com is your new home.

Headlines I love the smell of Baghdad alight with fire in the morning

Status
Not open for further replies.
26
0
0
#1
We had every right to bomb the shit out of Baghdad. Socialist and Marxist movements of uneducated developing country-gimps in Spain, Italy, Portugal are about as effective in influencing my cerebral foreign policy decisions as the morally decrepid Rastafarian protests are in London. The resolutions and mindless slaughter gave us pretense; UN inefficacy as evidenced in sub-Saharan Africa over the past decade gave us justification. Someone step-up and refute this so I can educate your gimp ass; or better yet, get a relative or friend to throwdown his two contrarian cents so I can humiliate him in front of you. You will step in line eventually.





dengirated@Nameless
 

lobo

Banned - What an Asshat!
224
0
0
#2
SHIT! FACHIST! FUCK! FAT ASS! DEGENERATE!
DAUN! DEBILL! PICHTA! BOLUDO! PELATUDO!

:mfinger: :mfinger: :mfinger:
 

anti-movielife

self medicated
248
0
0
#3
UN Peacekeeping Successes no one ever mentions:
Nicaragua, Mozambique, Namibia, and Eastern Slavonia/Croatia, East Timor, KOSOVO(good ole clinton i thot he was cool haha)

I found this article after getting pissed off with your comments:
heres ya go http://www.fpif.org/pdf/vol5/28ifpeace.pdf

"The U.S. has shortchanged the UN financially, imposed debilitating conditions, and failed to provide political support. By mid-2000, U.S. arrears totaled $1.36 billion, two-thirds the amount owed by all UN members. Washington has repeatedly blocked UN peacekeeping missions while initiating incursions outside UN purview."

maybe the UN would be a little more efficient if the US paid its bills...i dont think it really has a right to criticize when it has made no attempt to fix the problems...i also find it EXTREMELY ironic that a year ago bush came close to calling the UN obsolete...and TODAY hes begging for international support...talk about biting the hand that feeds you...
 

lobo

Banned - What an Asshat!
224
0
0
#4
ПИДАРАС!​

:mfinger:
 

anti-movielife

self medicated
248
0
0
#5
if I was president...everyone would get FREE cookies and milk!!!! vote me!
 

lobo

Banned - What an Asshat!
224
0
0
#6
President of what? Kanada or Kan-goo-roo?

Anyway, cokies and milk for me! :mfinger:
 
26
0
0
#8
Rofl

The uprisings you mentioned occured in relatively stable areas and hardly go to prove the efficacy of the UN. Furthermore, the Kosovo mission is termed "Interim Kosovo Mission" because they failed during the Kosovo mission (thousands of ethnic Albanians were summarily slaughtered under the UN's watchful eye), and this "interm" mission is to ensure that power is eventually transfered from the Serbian authority to a new government to be formed in the future. I would strongly advise you catchup on your Namibian, East Timorese and Balkan history before you try to cite some pathetic obvioulsy-biased opinionated article beseeching foreigners for increased donations. Bring me some empirical analysis.

Also, do you not see the errors of a US providing majority-funding to the UN? US GDP accounts for 1/3rd the total amount of world GDP, yet we have nowhere close to 1/3rd total authority over the UN. If our tax-dollars go towards funding UN operations, we want operations which are effective and bring about conflict resolution. The report cites our lack of funding for Rwandan and Congolese activities: who the fuck cares. Rwandans and Congolese were slaughtered en masse throughout the early 1990s (see CIA World Factbook for some history, chief), yet the UN didn't push proposals through until the late 1990s. Furthermore, the cost of UN peacekeepers is substantial; it takes a lot of money to convince impoverished, ineffective, and reluctant Pakistanis and other UN peacekeepers to perform their selected duties. The UN doesn't fight for anything besides world peace - employing a paradigm of tranquility which hardly resounds in the ears of soldiers nor encourages troops to increase productivity. UN Soldiers are VERY well paid, but remain VERY unmotivated. Funneling money into UN projects like Congo and Rwanada are useless; UN Intervention there has proved futile over the past 5 years (yes, there has been UN intervention despite our lack of 'legally mandated funding', and no, it has not been effective at all).

The UN is ineffective. If you want us to spend our *FAIR SHARE* of GDP on funding the UN, they had better give us our *FAIR SHARE* of power within the UN. You'd better ratify our attack-resolutions faster, and you'd better be more supportive of transfering power to democratic institutions- removing instability from developing countries. We don't need to be voted down by Bulgaria, Cameroon and former-Nazis in doing what we think is right. Telling us to blindly give the UN charitable funds is bullshit. It's like telling me to donate a million dollars to 50 random charities, including one which buys needles and drugs for drugusers in downtown London. I'm not going to fund a project I find morally reprehensible or one whose effectiveness is unproven. Those are sunk costs, and I'm not going to in effect burn my money on such causes. You present my government with viable, productive plans, and we will fund them provided you give us the power of decision we deserve. Otherwise, :mfinger: .



denigrated@nameless
 

lobo

Banned - What an Asshat!
224
0
0
#9
U, FUCKIN' BASTARD! WE ARE IGNORIN' U!
MARX, ENGELS, LENIN', STALIN', MAO - DA RULEZ FOREWA!
KROPOTKIN', BUCHARIN', GARIBALDI - OUR MAINSTREAM!
BUSH - OUR NEW HOPE AND FUTURE
ANARCHY IS OUR NEW ORDER

FUCK! FUCK! FUCK!

:mfinger:
 
#10
ok that's it

Your attempted rants most likely resemble labour-movement posters taped to lightpoles. Anarchy is not the new world order. STFU and take your bantering back to elementary school.
 

lobo

Banned - What an Asshat!
224
0
0
#11

YOU, SPRINKLERHEAD!
SCREW YOUR HOLE WITH MANIACURE SCISSORS!
I AM FRUSTRATED! YOU ARE STUPID!
YOU CAN'T HAVE A DEBATES!
YOU INSULTED ME!
FUCK YOU!

FUCK YOU!
FUCK YOU!

:mfinger:
"STOP BAD LANGUAGE"
TEAM IN ACTION

 
#12
...

To call you psychotic would be to grossly misjudge the nature of your incompetence. What the fuck is wrong with you?
 

lobo

Banned - What an Asshat!
224
0
0
#13
SOME BALLS KEEP YA FROM GOOD DANCE!
WE SHOULD CUT THESE OUT!

:mfinger:

so you are give-up! MWA-HA-HA!
 

mthrlangl

Clitpickle
102
0
0
#14
Jesus fucking Christ on a stick.

You're acting like an asshat. Both of you. The purpose of this board is to let people rant, not to deginerate into potty-mouthed two year olds arguing over God knows what at this point. :thumbsdn:

Speaking of asshats, I'm throwing Dubya up there for nomination. You're not going to make me think he's God's gift to warfare, and I'm wagering I'm not going to convince you that he's a imperialistic bastard.
 
#15
rofl

woman, while we're still having these rants and flames, would you care to enlighten me with your erudition as to how Bush is A) an asshat laureate, B) an imperialist, and C) why you are picking whichever candidate you're picking over him?




denigrated@nameless
 

lobo

Banned - What an Asshat!
224
0
0
#16
MTH, I did not expect such from U!
Why do You meddleing into the argue of two intellectuals?
This fascistic scunc wrote that he loves smell of peoples dead.
He wrote that he is smart and I am stupid.
He pedefiled 12 yrs old boy.

So... what kind of language You are preferring when speaking with such kind of shit?

MTH - don't even think about to interfere this... :mfinger: :mfinger:
 

lobo

Banned - What an Asshat!
224
0
0
#17
HEY! DEGINERATED! YOU ARE SHITHOLE
FUCK YOU, OLD BASTARD AND PEDOFIL!

:mfinger:
 
#18
...

I'm available for English and Font lessons Lobo. Contact if desired.
 

BRiT

CRaZY
Founder
11,776
2,443
487
#20
Mth, Ditto... Perhaps there needs to be an obvious flame-forum. We might even have that one already. I'd like to see some genuine debates on an intellectual level take place here. I suppose that's too much to hope for.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.